Venetians in the Street
This month’s question from the
Beachhead:
Is Venice better
off as part of L.A., or would it be better off independent?
Paul
Dalfonso:
I think Venice would be
better off away from LA. A lot of parts of LA, I don't like the way the city
runs them. I'd like it to be it's own entity. That's why I'm here. I don't like
the hustle and bustle of what goes on over there in the major part of LA. That's
why I like living
here.
----------
Vivica
Madrid:
I think we'd better off
independent, because the area is just so special. It's kind of it's own little
community in a way. When you live here, to tell you the truth, I rarely venture
out without a good reason, visit a family member or something, but I always stay
in the
area.
----------
Wendy
Miller:
Venice would be much better as
city of its own. It's unique. People don't judge you here. Freedom of
Speech.
-----------
Zubi
Muhammad:
I'd like to keep it
independent. I like the idea of keeping Venice a certain way. I feel like if the
city is involved, ultimately it will start changing Venice. I don't have any
evidence to prove that, it's just my
instinct.
------------
Mo
Ludlow:
We don’t need to be LA,
Venice is
better.
----------
Lynn
Tumpa:
I think Venice is better off as
part of LA. It sounds better, feels
better.
----------
Aria
Malbezzi:
I think we'd better of
independent, because LA isn't doing anything about those motor homes parked in
front of my property. I mean, million dollar property and you have people living
in motor homes all the time. I don't think it's fair. The city won't do anything
because they say it's street access to the beach. But I've got a guy living in
front of my house for more than a week, watching our kids. You don't know who's
there.
Posted: Sun - July 1, 2007 at 02:27 PM