Conservatives Win Venice Election
By Jim
Smith
A slate that includes several
Republicans, owners of multiple properties and advocates of decertification of
the neighborhood council last year, won a decisive victory in the Sept. 10-11
voting for the Board of the Grass Roots Venice Neighborhood Council.
They achieved their victory after waging an
expensive campaign in which they claimed to be the “real”
progressives. The Venice Progressives slate – which this newspaper
endorsed – won only six of 16 contests, compared to the upstart
“conservative progressives” who won all seven executive committee
offices, five of seven at-large positions and three of the seven district
positions.
The slate was apparently
organized by Marta Evry and friends who claimed it wasn’t a slate at all.
Among the dirty tricks were the publicizing of a website, <www.
veniceprogressives.org> that was nearly identical to the long standing Venice
Progressives website <www.venice-progressives.org>.
It is unknown who backed the slate,
aside from Marta Evry and what was the role of developers in funding their
expensive campaign, including paying for mailings. (Alice Stek, Treasurer of
Venice Progressives, reports that her slate spent around $1,200 on the election.
While DeDe Audet told the Beachhead that she thinks both groups spent about
$4,000 each.)
Venice Progressives had
initially cried foul when the election was switched from June to September in
defiance of the GRVNC bylaws.
Quite a
few of the just elected board members signed onto the ad-hoc election committee
which, with the encouragement of the city’s Dept. of Neighborhood
Empowerment (DONE), wrote the rules under which the vote was conducted. The
rules included strict requirements for identification, very limited absentee
voting, and a ban on campaigning within 500 feet of the polling place (five
times that of state and federal elections), and a polling place that is
generally considered to be in Mar Vista, not
Venice.
According to David Buchanan,
owner of Marina Media and an associate of some of the candidates who variously
called themselves “independents,” “real progressives”
and the “Venice Progress Coalition,” the slate includes the
following:
• 2 progressives by
reputation and action – Linda Lucks and Kelly Willis (many Venice
Progressives would dispute that Willis is any kind of
progressive);
• 2 Moderate Republicans
– DeDe Audet and Richard Myers;
•
2 Conservative Republicans – CJ Cole and Yolanda
Gonzalez;
• 9 of varying political
philosophies or unknown.
Since Audet,
Myers, Cole and Gonzalez are all on the executive committee, this means that
four out of the seven executive officers are Republicans, if Buchanan is
correct.
Don’t pack your bags for
Berkeley yet. It’s doubtful that Venice has really turned conservative.
Only two days after the Neighborhood
Council election, there was a State Assembly election in which much of Venice
gave more votes to the Peace and Freedom candidate than they gave to all of the
four Republicans who were running, combined.
Instead, several factors combined to
defeat the Venice Progressives:
1) a
well-funded campaign was run by the opposition;
2) dirty tricks were used, including
confusing voters as to who were the real progressives;
3) several years of continuous attacks on
the progressives had a cumulative effect;
4) a number of the conservatives
played key roles on the ad hoc election committee and wrote rules that were
conducive to their getting elected;
5)
presidential candidate DeDe Audet was listed on the GRVNC website as the
election committee chairperson up until the last week of the campaign;
6) most Progressives who had been on
the previous GRVNC board chose not to run again, and for various reasons, did
little to help their slate get
elected.
Shortly after the election,
the Venice Progressives candidates met and decided not to file challenges to the
election. According to Sabrina Venskus, there were plenty of reasons to
challenge the election, but most candidates felt that they would be swiftly
rejected by the city’s Dept. of Neighborhood Empowerment (DONE), headed by
Greg Nelson. Several of the Progressives have been calling on Mayor Antonio
Vlilaraigosa to replace Nelson with a more neutral department head.
In addition, with new elections due
next June according to the GRVNC bylaws, Progressives felt their time could be
better spent organizing a stronger progressive majority and involving themselves
in the work of the Neighborhood Council.
Posted: Sat
- October 1, 2005 at 02:10 PM